MegMegMeg
头像
中士
  • 中士
  • 931
  • 1
  • 990
  • 0
  • @2010-06-25
发表于:2022-01-26 13:35|只看TA
字体大小:T|T

自从加州零元购以后,三番好多cvs walgreen都关门大吉了,因为太多偷东西的。我公婆家旁边的walgreen也刚刚关门了,附近很多老年人拿药都不知道该去哪,加州已经被牛森和harris搞成个笑话。


20
Advertisement
ATuTuA
头像
中士
  • 中士
  • 1017
  • 1
  • 1028
  • 0
  • @2020-01-30
发表于:2022-01-26 13:36|只看TA
字体大小:T|T


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/parents-guilty-murder-raised-radicals-chesa-boudin-san-francisco-s-n1101071

0
Advertisement
littlefat
头像
上士
  • 上士
  • 1549
  • 1
  • 4381
  • 1
  • @2005-12-11
发表于:2022-01-26 13:53|只看楼主
字体大小:T|T


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/parents-guilty-murder-raised-radicals-chesa-boudin-san-francisco-s-n1101071


ATuTuA 发表于 2022-01-26 13:36

无论他背景是什么,作为da他就是失职

0
Aldi
头像
  • 禁止访问
  • 4731
  • 5
  • 4853
  • 0
  • @2021-11-30
发表于:2022-01-26 13:57|只看TA
字体大小:T|T

自从加州零元购以后,三番好多cvs walgreen都关门大吉了,因为太多偷东西的。我公婆家旁边的walgreen也刚刚关门了,附近很多老年人拿药都不知道该去哪,加州已经被牛森和harris搞成个笑话。



MegMegMeg 发表于 2022-01-26 13:35


无法无天吗


0
Advertisement
JohnChan
头像
下士
  • 下士
  • 713
  • 0
  • 741
  • 0
  • @2020-04-17
发表于:2022-01-26 14:28|只看TA
字体大小:T|T

支持!


need to raise our voice

0
littlefat
头像
上士
  • 上士
  • 1549
  • 1
  • 4381
  • 1
  • @2005-12-11
发表于:2022-01-26 15:03|只看楼主
字体大小:T|T

支持!


need to raise our voice


JohnChan 发表于 2022-01-26 14:28

对,就是这个意思!

0
basic_world
头像
列兵
  • 列兵
  • 5
  • 0
  • 5
  • 0
  • @2022-01-24
发表于:2022-01-26 17:44|只看TA
字体大小:T|T

如果仅仅以asian hate crime不作为这个理由,那这个诉讼最终会不了了之。


因为要在法庭上要有证据才能定罪, hate crime是一个很难取证的罪名,除非犯罪分子在作案时一边呼喊着反亚裔的口号,一边作案,并且有人录像或者其他人证。否则你怎么证明犯罪份子仇恨亚裔呢?

你不能说一个人打劫了亚裔,就能证明他仇恨亚裔啊,他完全可以狡辩说,他打劫纯粹时是了钱;就像人吃猪肉,牛肉,但是人并不恨猪和牛,人吃猪和牛纯粹是因为人饿了。DA也可以狡辩说,“我没有证据,我也不能起诉别人啊。”


因为Hate Crime难以取证这个特点,Anti Asian Hate Crime, 并不是一个很好的口号,更不是一个好的法律。这个法律/口号,反而转移了舆论的视线,让大家忘了证明Crime本身其实很容易证明,比如刚才说的打劫这个例子,要证明Hate很难,但是要证明打劫这个行为却容易得多。而且打劫/袭击,这类行为本身就可以被定罪。


作为选民,应该督促议员们严格立法,比如加大对抢劫,袭击,砸车这类行为的惩罚力度,还要督促警察,DA们赶紧打击Crime,而不是纠结于Hate Crime。

最后编辑basic_world 最后编辑于 2022/01/26 18:18:08
14
JohnChan
头像
下士
  • 下士
  • 713
  • 0
  • 741
  • 0
  • @2020-04-17
发表于:2022-01-26 18:11|只看TA
字体大小:T|T

https://www.yahoo.com/news/elderly-man-ptsd-sf-chinatown-233400779.html


An elderly Asian American man who fell victim to a brutal attack in broad daylight in San Francisco two years ago is launching a federal lawsuit against the city’s District Attorney’s Office for allegedly mishandling his case and mistreating him in the process.


Anh Lê, 69, was out for a walk in Chinatown on Nov. 2, 2019, when a father-and-son duo threatened to kill him and repeatedly struck him with a baseball bat. He managed to call 911 after running away as far as he could.


Lê said it all started after he politely asked the teenage son, who was riding a bicycle, to be careful since it was a crowded sidewalk and he nearly collided with him.


Shortly after, the teenager took out a baseball bat from his mother’s bag and hit Lê multiple times. His father, identified as Jimmy Tanner Sr., then raised a glass bottle and threatened to kill Lê.

The incident, which was witnessed by a shocked crowd, occurred in front of a Chinese grocery store at 1118 Stockton St. Lê said Tanner’s wife, who was with another teenage son, “seemed to watch with glee” as the attack unfolded.


“I pleaded with the Tanners to stop, but they relished in their ability to inflict pain and


fear on a defenseless senior citizen,” Lê said in a victim impact statement provided to NextShark. “The attack was the most brutal, terrifying, and humiliating experience of my life, and has stayed with me ever since.”


After the incident, Lê, who is Vietnamese American, learned that the Tanners had targeted other Asian Americans on the same day. The alleged attacks also took place in Chinatown.


The Tanners reportedly entered S&M Ginseng Inc. and Chinese Herbal Store at 1000 Stockton St., just a few blocks from where Lê was attacked, and threatened its store owner and customers. The teen who struck Lê with the baseball bat allegedly used the same object to hit a customer.


Lê said he also learned of a third “terroristic” attack committed by the family near Broadway and Stockton Street. The alleged incident occurred after the attack on himself.


Lê quickly reported his experience to San Francisco police, which led to the Tanners’ arrest later on the same day. The father, Tanner Sr., was taken into custody for battery, felony elder abuse and felony terroristic threats.


The San Francisco District Attorney’s Office, however, refused to prosecute either the father or son with hate crime enhancements and agreed to a lenient plea deal with Tanner Sr., who pled guilty to a misdemeanor battery charge for no jail time and only a year of probation — all without Lê’s knowledge.


In addition to failing to notify Lê of plea deal discussions, the District Attorney’s Office allegedly also failed to provide him a chance to enter a victim impact statement during the proceedings. Consequently, no such statement was read at the plea deal hearing.


Additionally, the office allegedly refused to correct a Criminal Protective Order (CPO) that omitted Lê’s last name — identifying him only as “Anh L” — and misstated his age. Such errors led to Lê doubt the enforceability of the order.


Lê spent months trying to correct the CPO, but his requests have fallen on deaf ears, according to him. Even after retaining pro bono counsel, the District Attorney’s Office allegedly continued to ignore him, even telling him at one point that he had no right to be at hearings.


Lê, who is represented by King & Spalding LLP — a member of the Alliance for Asian American Justice — is now suing the District Attorney’s Office under the Fourteenth Amendment. He is accusing the office of applying procedures that resulted in discriminatory effects on Asian Americans and creating practices that deny victims adequate due process protections.


Lê is also bringing a claim against the City and County of San Francisco, which may be liable for any constitutional violations found to have been committed by its officials. With anti-Asian hate crimes still on the rise, he fears facing another attack and similar failures in the justice system.


The 69-year-old said the incident has left him with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). He spent 52 weeks in psychiatric therapy, according to court documents.


“Ever since November 2019, I cannot help but picture the attack over and over again. I no longer feel safe walking the streets of our city, as I used to love to do. I look over my shoulder and wonder if there are people who want to hurt me, because I am Asian American,” Lê said.


“Although I was extraordinarily lucky not to have been seriously injured or killed, the attack has left me with a profound and lasting feeling of fear, anxiety, helplessness and hopelessness.”


In a statement, Quyen Ta, a member of Lê’s legal team at King & Spalding, said they are proud to represent the 69-year-old victim.


“We are grateful that the Alliance for Asian American Justice brought this case to our attention. We are proud to represent Mr. Lê, a courageous Vietnamese American hate crime victim who is willing to speak out to ensure that other AAPI hate crimes victims will be treated fairly by the San Francisco DA’s office,” Ta said.


“We look forward to working with the DA’s office to ensure that victims like Mr. Le have a voice in the criminal justice system — including during the sentencing of defendants who have attacked AAPI victims.”

1
Advertisement
sugarbabylove
头像
中尉
  • 中尉
  • 2066
  • 2
  • 2071
  • 0
  • @2021-07-03
发表于:2022-01-26 18:15|只看TA
字体大小:T|T

真的头痛。这些左派当道的地方,很多人觉得警察是邪恶的,反而给犯罪分子更多的empathy

话说回来,还是要给视频里的abc大叔大妈们点赞的。

0
iheartnyc
头像
上校
  • 上校
  • 4855
  • 5
  • 5235
  • 0
  • @2019-07-05
发表于:2022-01-26 20:26|只看TA
字体大小:T|T

如果仅仅以asian hate crime不作为这个理由,那这个诉讼最终会不了了之。


因为要在法庭上要有证据才能定罪, hate crime是一个很难取证的罪名,除非犯罪分子在作案时一边呼喊着反亚裔的口号,一边作案,并且有人录像或者其他人证。否则你怎么证明犯罪份子仇恨亚裔呢?

你不能说一个人打劫了亚裔,就能证明他仇恨亚裔啊,他完全可以狡辩说,他打劫纯粹时是了钱;就像人吃猪肉,牛肉,但是人并不恨猪和牛,人吃猪和牛纯粹是因为人饿了。DA也可以狡辩说,“我没有证据,我也不能起诉别人啊。”


因为Hate Crime难以取证这个特点,Anti Asian Hate Crime, 并不是一个很好的口号,更不是一个好的法律。这个法律/口号,反而转移了舆论的视线,让大家忘了证明Crime本身其实很容易证明,比如刚才说的打劫这个例子,要证明Hate很难,但是要证明打劫这个行为却容易得多。而且打劫/袭击,这类行为本身就可以被定罪。


作为选民,应该督促议员们严格立法,比如加大对抢劫,袭击,砸车这类行为的惩罚力度,还要督促警察,DA们赶紧打击Crime,而不是纠结于Hate Crime。


basic_world 发表于 2022-01-26 17:44

这个不难,把所有被起诉hate crime的和没有被起诉hate crime 拿来对比一下看看对asian有没有明显的标准不同。

4
Advertisement

回复贴子